This is a typical response to Liz Collin's recent film, "The Fall of Minneapolis," which the New York Times has ignored, but which Glenn Loury and John McWhorter have been discussing, here and here. Or here, if it's already been removed from the other places.
The basic thesis--backed up with the full toxicology report on George Floyd, revealed a heart condition, atheroschlerosis, and levels of fentanyl and other drugs that could have killed him if he'd been sitting home in an armchair.
But he kicked an officer. He agitatedly resisted arrest--I can see that; the full bodycam videos in the film show him arguing in the confused way that drunks do. He insisted he'd been shot during a previous arrest, which was either a delusion, an irrational fear, or a lie. The cop yelled, "Getcha fuckin' hands on the wheel!" and Floyd continued to wave them around and whine, "Don't shoot me."
Both were behaving badly. Language, officer! Narcotics Anonymous, George Floyd!
Would George Floyd have died so quickly if he'd been
sitting up? And if he had died sitting up, would his death have been understood as inevitable?
I always thought this case was about a sadistic cop--not racism. But what if it's about a distracted or careless cop, or a cop who was blindly following the manual, and nobody realized George Floyd had just swallowed a bunch of pills in order to prevent them being discovered? There is that moment in the film catching white stuff dissolving on Floyd's tongue and foam around his mouth. The toxicology report in the film indicates he had very high levels of drugs in his system, but the one by a pulmonologist (here's the NPR version of that: https://www.npr.org/sections/trial-over-killing-of-george-floyd/2021/04/08/985347984/chauvin-trial-medical-expert-says-george-floyd-died-from-a-lack-of-oxygen) says the pressure on his body, coupled with his position on the ground, caused his death. And that he could tolerate huge amounts of drugs, amounts that would have killed a first-time user, and that he'd have behaved sluggishly if he'd really felt intoxicated. Then there's the condition of his heart and the fact he'd had COVID.
My head is spinning. George Floyd was clearly no angel; I can try to imagine being a cop and thinking "If I sit him up, he can jump up and kick me again." But then again, one of the younger cops said, "Shouldn't we roll him over and check his pulse?" Was Chauvin careless or negligent? Or was he just trying to prevent Floyd from a greater mobility that would have created more difficulties --while wondering where the heck the damn ambulance was?
It looks as though George Floyd was an unknown quantity--a large, muscular man who denied being high but who looked high, and who appears to have swallowed a handful of pills as he was being arrested--and these pills were taking effect the whole time, but since he denied being on drugs, the police waited 36 seconds to call the ambulance. Which got there very late--then--and this is on film--the team bungled the treatment, since the oxygen tube was used improperly--that is, not unpacked, so that he did not receive oxgen.
What impresses me most is the interviews with the many former police officers of the third precinct, and the few who have remained on the force. They all seemed straightforward, deeply wounded, and not remotely racist. The film is worth watching just for those interviews.
This case was about power. Very simple.
ReplyDeleteYes, but your comment is so brief I'm now sure which power--or whose power--you mean. Please do expand.
ReplyDelete